Cranford NJ Topics Only.

TINA RENNA: INEFFECTIVE c*** OR JUST INEFFECTIVE

You may select up to 2 options

 
 
View results

Re: TINA RENNA: INEFFECTIVE c*** OR JUST INEFFECTIVE

Postby jbken on Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:08 am

Pity you're not getting to her:

User avatar
jbken
Cranford Talk User
Cranford Talk User
 
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:45 pm

Re: TINA RENNA: INEFFECTIVE c*** OR JUST INEFFECTIVE

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:18 am

Good to know that she's so unaffected by us that she decided to address it in a special YouTube broadcast.
Guest
 

Re: TINA RENNA: INEFFECTIVE c*** OR JUST INEFFECTIVE

Postby urallsheep on Tue Aug 03, 2010 4:47 pm

you folks are a sad, sad joke. Whats wrong with someone wanting accountability for MY hard earned tax dollars. 16k on bottled water, 100k plus slaries for part time useless jobs, enough is enough. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK T.R
urallsheep
 

Re: TINA RENNA: INEFFECTIVE c*** OR JUST INEFFECTIVE

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:51 pm

You have accountability every time you cast your vote. Vote them out if you don't like them, run yorself, get out there and campaign, donate to the cause, lots of ways to make things change.
Guest
 

Re: TINA RENNA: INEFFECTIVE c*** OR JUST INEFFECTIVE

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:52 pm

urallsheep wrote:you folks are a sad, sad joke. Whats wrong with someone wanting accountability for MY hard earned tax dollars. 16k on bottled water, 100k plus slaries for part time useless jobs, enough is enough. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK T.R

what has changed thanks to TR? $800,000 on OPRAs?
Guest
 

Re: TINA RENNA: INEFFECTIVE c*** OR JUST INEFFECTIVE

Postby reasonableguest on Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:15 pm

Guest wrote:
urallsheep wrote:you folks are a sad, sad joke. Whats wrong with someone wanting accountability for MY hard earned tax dollars. 16k on bottled water, 100k plus slaries for part time useless jobs, enough is enough. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK T.R

what has changed thanks to TR? $800,000 on OPRAs?



One thing that has changed is that the county is not ignoring the watchdogs anymore. The union county propaganda dept head and even some of the freehodlers are now taking to fighting it out in the local newspapers. The minions are even on this forum as "guests" in trying to marginalize the organization. There is just too much information now out there about the union county government waste and abuse. It now looks like eveything they do in programs and construction is specifically designed to enrich the vendors and professionals and has little to do with actual public interest involved. I'd say they are definitely informing the county taxpayers what the heck is going on down in elizabeth. I commend them for the groudswell that is hapening.

And the posters are even wrong in referring to the voter booth as the means of change. The county owns elizabeth and that is where all our tax moneys go, and the voting block is. This is the major roadblock to good change. And why anyone on this forum would support the county's actions after reading the watchdog blog is beyond me. TR has definitely uncovered and exposed just how pervasive the problem with machine politics are. Christie is doing the same but on the higer level. He is probably being made fully aware of what is happening in this county and one of his underlings is hopefully reading the watchdog blog to understand. Good luck to us all.
reasonableguest
Cranford Talk User
Cranford Talk User
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 12:27 am

Re: TINA RENNA: INEFFECTIVE c*** OR JUST INEFFECTIVE

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:30 pm

reasonableguest wrote:
Guest wrote:
urallsheep wrote:you folks are a sad, sad joke. Whats wrong with someone wanting accountability for MY hard earned tax dollars. 16k on bottled water, 100k plus slaries for part time useless jobs, enough is enough. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK T.R

what has changed thanks to TR? $800,000 on OPRAs?



One thing that has changed is that the county is not ignoring the watchdogs anymore. The union county propaganda dept head and even some of the freehodlers are now taking to fighting it out in the local newspapers. The minions are even on this forum as "guests" in trying to marginalize the organization. There is just too much information now out there about the union county government waste and abuse. It now looks like eveything they do in programs and construction is specifically designed to enrich the vendors and professionals and has little to do with actual public interest involved. I'd say they are definitely informing the county taxpayers what the heck is going on down in elizabeth. I commend them for the groudswell that is hapening.

And the posters are even wrong in referring to the voter booth as the means of change. The county owns elizabeth and that is where all our tax moneys go, and the voting block is. This is the major roadblock to good change. And why anyone on this forum would support the county's actions after reading the watchdog blog is beyond me. TR has definitely uncovered and exposed just how pervasive the problem with machine politics are. Christie is doing the same but on the higer level. He is probably being made fully aware of what is happening in this county and one of his underlings is hopefully reading the watchdog blog to understand. Good luck to us all.

oh stop making excuses! You want change, get some decent republican candidates instead of the usual array of MORONS, spend some MONEY and run a decent campaign. How is that that not that many years ago Republicans were the majority, there were no voters in Elizabeth then? Machine politics operate with both parties, I would be asking Phil why he never invest his money in his freeholder candidates, its very curious.
Guest
 

Re: TINA RENNA: INEFFECTIVE c*** OR JUST INEFFECTIVE

Postby Zoots on Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:08 pm

Guest622 wrote:Zoots

Just because the County windbag says Tina's OPRA requests have cost the County $800,000 doesn't make it true. She has won cases against the county. Maybe it's the County's secrecy that has costs the taxpayers money.

I could jump on the County watchers bandwagon if i saw results. But for all the time and all the money, "Where's the beef"? Where is the smoking gun? How come indictments from the fed or the state haven't come down. Probably because there isn't any evidence of wrong doing.
I'm sure the $800,000 is true because if it wasn't, Tina would argue against the figure as an example of the Freeholders lies.
Just because we don't like or agree with what the freeholder do, doesn't make it illegal. When Tina brings down the bad guys,i'll give her some credit.Until that time, I'm not impressed. Sorry!
Respectfully Yours,
Zoots
Zoots
Cranford Talk User
Cranford Talk User
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:40 pm

Re: TINA RENNA: INEFFECTIVE c*** OR JUST INEFFECTIVE

Postby the rennas are dirty sluts on Wed Aug 11, 2010 4:42 pm

She is GREAT wrote:Tina tells the truth and that scares the hell out of a lot of people, especially the originator of this topic. For the topic originator to resort to such lowbrow posting she must be very effective.


f*** tina shes a dumb republican bitch whose argumentative strategies are maddeningly stupid. shes should kill herself
the rennas are dirty sluts
 

Previous

Return to CranfordTalk - Cranford Topics

  • VISITORS

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 5 guests

cranfordtalk.org - Cranford Talk - Cranford NJ's Most Popular Community Forum